In the early hours of Saturday, Cyprus agreed to a "bailout" with the EU and IMF that is very controversial because it imposes an immediate one-time tax on everyone with money in a Cypriot bank before banks reopen on Tuesday (Monday is a holiday).
The deal still needs to be passed by Parliament and that's not a sure thing.
The Cypriot government is now sweating over a possible rejection by the island’s parliament of the shocking set of measures imposed on Nicosia for the eurozone to bail its economy out of a likely default, announced in the early hours of Saturday.
The Cypriot government is preparing the bill to be tabled in Parliament probably on Sunday in an emergency session, as everything will have to be voted by Monday night for Cypriot banks to open on Tuesday.
IN PRATICA L'EUROPA HA OBBLIGATO CIPRO AL SALVATAGGIO DELLE BANCHE E DELLO STATO IN CAMBIO DELL'ESPROPRIO DEI SOLDI DEI CONTI CORRENTI DEI CITTADINI CIPRIOTI
The stakes are incredibly high. Here's a statement from Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades warning of total financial collapse and euro exit if there's no deal (via @dsquareddigest).
IL PRESIDENTE DI CIPRO AVVISA DI UN PROBABILE COLLASSO FINANZIARIO E DELLA POSSIBILITA' DI UNA USCITA DAL''EURO IN CASO L'OPERAZIONE NON DOVESSE ESSERE APPROVATA DAL PARLAMENTO
Full statement from President Anastasiades below the dotted line
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is well known that the deep economic crisis and the state of emergency in which the country has found itself did not come about in the last fortnight since we have undertaken the administration of the country.
The state of emergency and critical nature of the times do not allow me, as they do not allow anyone, to embark on a blame game.
In the extraordinary meeting of the Eurogroup, we faced decisions that had already been taken and came across faits accomplis through which we were faced with the following dilemmas:
On Tuesday, March 19 we would either choose the catastrophic scenario of disorderly bankruptcy or the scenario of a painful but controlled management of the crisis, which would put a definitive end to the uncertainty and restart our economy.
A possible choice of the catastrophic scenario option would have the following consequences:
1. On Tuesday, March 19, immediately after the holiday weekend, one of the two banks in crisis would cease to operate, since the European Central Bank, following the decision already taken, would terminate the provision of liquidity. The second bank would suspend its work, and neither could avoid collapse. Such a phenomenon would instantly lead 8.000 families to unemployment.
2. The State would be obliged to compensate depositors in response to the obligation regarding guaranteed deposits. The capital required in such a case would amount to about 30 billion euros, which the State would be unable to pay.
3. A proportionate amount corresponding to the deposits of thousands of depositors for deposits over 100.000 Euro, would be led to a vicious cycle of asset liquidation, and these depositors would suffer losses of over 60%.
4. Such an uncontrolled situation would push the whole banking system into collapse with all the attendant consequences.
5. Thousands of small and medium enterprises, and other businesses would be driven to bankruptcy due to their inability to trade.
As a result of the above, the service sector would be led to a complete collapse with a possible exit from the euro. That, in addition to the national weakening of Cyprus, would lead to devaluation of the currency by at least 40%.
The second choice was the controlled management of the crisis, through the decisions taken and which can be summarized as follows:
1. Ensuring the liquidity of the banks and the rescue of the banking system through their recapitalization.
2. Rescuing 8.000 jobs in the banking sector and thousands of others which would be lost as a corollary of not maintaining the operations of banks.
3. Total rescuing of deposits, with just the exchange of a small percentage of savings with shares of the two banks. Currently, these shares do not have their full value, but with the economic recovery they will repay most it not all of the amount that will be cut.
4. This option results in a drastic reduction of public debt, makes it manageable and sustainable and relieves future generations from the burden of repayment.
5. It saves provident and pension funds and avoids taking other tough measures such as wage and pension cuts that were put on the negotiations table.
6. It avoids further recession and the risk of the vicious circle of a second memorandum.
The state of emergency and critical nature of the times do not allow me, as they do not allow anyone, to embark on a blame game.
In the extraordinary meeting of the Eurogroup, we faced decisions that had already been taken and came across faits accomplis through which we were faced with the following dilemmas:
On Tuesday, March 19 we would either choose the catastrophic scenario of disorderly bankruptcy or the scenario of a painful but controlled management of the crisis, which would put a definitive end to the uncertainty and restart our economy.
A possible choice of the catastrophic scenario option would have the following consequences:
1. On Tuesday, March 19, immediately after the holiday weekend, one of the two banks in crisis would cease to operate, since the European Central Bank, following the decision already taken, would terminate the provision of liquidity. The second bank would suspend its work, and neither could avoid collapse. Such a phenomenon would instantly lead 8.000 families to unemployment.
2. The State would be obliged to compensate depositors in response to the obligation regarding guaranteed deposits. The capital required in such a case would amount to about 30 billion euros, which the State would be unable to pay.
3. A proportionate amount corresponding to the deposits of thousands of depositors for deposits over 100.000 Euro, would be led to a vicious cycle of asset liquidation, and these depositors would suffer losses of over 60%.
4. Such an uncontrolled situation would push the whole banking system into collapse with all the attendant consequences.
5. Thousands of small and medium enterprises, and other businesses would be driven to bankruptcy due to their inability to trade.
As a result of the above, the service sector would be led to a complete collapse with a possible exit from the euro. That, in addition to the national weakening of Cyprus, would lead to devaluation of the currency by at least 40%.
The second choice was the controlled management of the crisis, through the decisions taken and which can be summarized as follows:
1. Ensuring the liquidity of the banks and the rescue of the banking system through their recapitalization.
2. Rescuing 8.000 jobs in the banking sector and thousands of others which would be lost as a corollary of not maintaining the operations of banks.
3. Total rescuing of deposits, with just the exchange of a small percentage of savings with shares of the two banks. Currently, these shares do not have their full value, but with the economic recovery they will repay most it not all of the amount that will be cut.
4. This option results in a drastic reduction of public debt, makes it manageable and sustainable and relieves future generations from the burden of repayment.
5. It saves provident and pension funds and avoids taking other tough measures such as wage and pension cuts that were put on the negotiations table.
6. It avoids further recession and the risk of the vicious circle of a second memorandum.
IN PRATICA IL PRESIDENTE DI CIPRO DECIDE DI TOGLIERE IL DIRITTO ALLA PROPRIETA' PRIVATA AI CITTADINI, SI ARROGA IL DIRITTO DI APPROPRIARSI DI RICCHEZZE ALTRUI CHE AVEVANO PAGATO REGOLARMENTE LE TASSE.
E' L'OLOCAUSTO DEI RISPARMI IN NOME DI UN SOCIALISMO BECERO. UN ERRORE ENORME CHE CREA UN PRECEDENTE...NESSUNO POTRA' MAI PIU' FIDARSI DI UNO STATO COME CIPRO CHE MANDA A FANCULO I PIU' ELEMENTARI DIRITTI DEI CITTADINI
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento